Archive

Posts Tagged ‘innovation’

Invest in America Alliance

February 24th, 2010

Intel announced a $3.5 billion initiative “to support investment in U.S.-based growth-oriented industries and detailed a commitment to significantly increase jobs available this year for recent college graduates.”

The headline of Intel’s press release says, “Invest in America Alliance to Fund American Technology Companies, Create Jobs for College Grads.” The story was covered bytechnology reporter Claire Cain Miller in the  New York Times, as well as by many others.

Miller begins her article by saying, “Technologists have been worrying aloud for years that America is losing its competitive edge as other countries invest more heavily in technology education and innovation.”

The alliance is led by Intel and is supported by 24 leading venture capital firms and corporations, aims to further anchor America’s competitiveness on the global stage. Intel President and CEO Paul Otellini said the announcement represents ”an investment in the country’s innovators and a signal to the global marketplace about America’s commitment to innovation and future competitiveness.” (read the full transcript of Otellini’s speech).

Venture Capital firms joining the Invest in America alliance include:

  • Advanced Technology Ventures
  • Braemar Energy Ventures
  • Bridgescale Partners
  • Canaan Partners
  • DCM
  • Draper Fisher Jurvetson
  • Flywheel Ventures
  • Good Energies
  • Institutional Venture Partners
  • Investcorp Technology Partners
  • Khosla Ventures
  • Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers
  • Menlo Ventures
  • Mohr Davidow Ventures
  • New Enterprise Associates
  • North Bridge Venture Partners
  • QuestMark Partners
  • Sevin Rosen Funds
  • Storm Ventures
  • Telesoft Partners
  • Updata Partners
  • U.S. Venture Partners
  • Venrock and Walden International

Companies joining the Invest in America alliance include:

  • Accenture
  • Adobe Systems Incorporated
  • Autodesk
  • Broadcom Corporation
  • CDW LLC.
  • Cisco
  • Dell
  • eBay
  • Inc.
  • EMC Corporation
  • GE
  • Google
  • Inc.
  • HP
  • Liberty Mutual Group
  • Marvell Semiconductor Inc.
  • Microsoft Corporation
  • Yahoo!

Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Facebook

Uncategorized , , ,

Revisiting “Innovation does not equal technology”

February 7th, 2010

In a blog post that could only have struck the most resonant chords in my heart, Jeffrey Phillips writes, “Innovation does not equal technology.”

Phillips isVP of Sales and Marketing at OVO, the innovation consulting division of NetCentrics. He blogged that while giving a speech recently to a university audience, he was confronted by a senior staff member who argued that innovation was equated to technology, and only scientists and engineers could bring new technologies to life. 

Phillips argument in response was (rightly!) that “that definition of innovation is awfully narrow.” Readers of this blog, and anyone who has taken my “Markting Complex Innovation” course will know that my cardinal equation is:

Innovation = Invention + Marketing

As I tell my students, and as I frequently tell our clients, transforming inventions into innovations is how money is made. And those transformations are not just the responsibility of your technical staff. To quote myself (because I can), “Without great technology PR, every great innovation is worth less, and maybe even worthless.” That is to say that innovation management is not only about creating a technology for the market, but also about creating a market for the technology, or what I like to call “engineering perception.”

Phillips says, “Technology innovation is a subset of innovation generally, and while all technology innovation is innovation, all innovation is not technology innovation.” Well put. And it’s because I love engineering and the technological invention it produces that I’ve spent most of my adult life dedicated to giving a voice to those technologies. Because that’s how invention turns into innovation.

Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Facebook

Uncategorized ,

Friedman calls for “Innovation Movement”

January 24th, 2010

Readers of my blog know I’m an unabashed fan of NYT columnist Thomas Friedman. Why? Because he consistently gets the world of innovation and how innovation drives, is driven by, and interconnects with so many aspects of geopolitics and economics (from micro to macro).

In his latest column, “More (Steve) Jobs, Jobs, Jobs, Jobs,” Friedman says President Obama should launch a “moon shot” initiative to get millions of American kids excited about innovation and entrepreneurship again. Friedman calls for the President ”to make 2010 the year of innovation, the year of making our pie bigger, the year of “Start-Up America” (a veiled reference to “Startup Nation” perhaps?)

Obama should bring together the country’s leading innovators, Friedman advocates, and ask them: “What legislation, what tax incentives, do we need right now to replicate you all a million times over” — and make that his No. 1 priority.

Friedman’s line in the sand (and I would dearly love it if someone would put this on an index card and put it on the President’s desk tomorrow morning) is this: “Inspiring, reviving and empowering Start-up America is [Obama's] moon shot.” Readers of this blog will not be surprised to know that I LOVE IT.

Let us, the innovators, the entrepreneurs, and yes even (or especially?) the marketers, endorse Thomas Friedman’s epic call to action. Let us tell the President we stand ready to help launch a year, a decade, a century of innovation. Let us ask for his leadership, and then let’s march forward to ride the twin rocket engines of innovation and entrepreneurship to all the economic recovery this world needs.

Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Facebook

Uncategorized , , , ,

Scenes from CES

January 11th, 2010

I spent just one day at CES last week – clearly not enough time to take in all the gadgetry, but then again, it was plenty.

What I was certainly able to discern was the palpable difference from just one year ago when attendance felt tepid, and the mood was somber. At that time, we were just a few months removed from the economic nosedive, President Obama was still a couple weeks away from being inaugurated, and the stress of so much uncertainty was pretty much freaking everyone out big time.

This year, there was a bouyant giddyness in the air. Not only have we survived (sure, I know we could double-dip, etc., but…), but everyone seemed to be saying, “look at all this innovation we’ve produced while Rome was burning.”

In face, the Consumer Electronics Association says over 20,000 new products were unveiled last week in Las Vegas. That’s a lot of innovation.

3DTV technology abounded (I must have tried out a dozen different disposable eyeglasses), and numerous technologies sought to eliminate, once and for all, the tangled mess of wires that pervades our connected lives.

As a lover of technology, I was exceedingly pleased at the positive vibe pervading each and every acre of show floor space at this year’s show.

I boarded the red-eye home with a great feeling that my own optimism (based on how much innovation I see among our clients on a daily basis) is justified, confirmed and shared throughout this big innovative industry of ours.

Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Facebook

Uncategorized , ,

Wireless Predictions for 2010

January 4th, 2010

Certainly no calendar flip would be complete without a laundry list of predictions for the new year. FierceWireless has put together a compelling predictions for the wireless industry. To summarize:

  • Palm will be purchased by another handset vendor
  • Pricing, coverage issues will hinder cable companies’ wireless offerings
  • Sprint Nextel’s 4G leadership will help revive the carrier
  • Huawei will get one LTE deal in North America
  • At least one wireless carrier will experiment with usage-based data pricing
  • Motorola will show some signs of recovery thanks to Android (last year, FierceWireless predicted “Motorola’s handset division will cease to be“)
  • Computer makers’ attempts at Android smartphones will flounder

Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Facebook

Uncategorized , , , , ,

When charities benefit from innovation economies

December 23rd, 2009

When Rainier client CopperGate was acquired by Sigma Designs a couple months ago, plenty of people made some nice sums of money. What I didn’t know at the time was that Tmura, the Israeli Public Service Venture Fund would convert options granted by CopperGate six years ago into $100,000!

Founded in 2002 to increase the involvement of the high-tech community in non-profit activity in Israel, Tmura receives donations of equity from (mainly private) Israeli and Israel-related high-tech companies and uses the proceeds from successful “exits” such as a public offering or acquisition to fund education- and youth-related initiatives in Israel. “Tmura” is the Hebrew word for “change” or “metamorphosis” and also means “value for money”; it is also a play on the word “truma”, which means “donation”.

CopperGate was Tmura’s 21st such exit event – exits to date have generated more than $2,600,000 for charity, which has benefited more than 20 different non-profit organizations in Israel.

Tmura grantees are mainly youth oriented. For example, Kadima youth centers have received Tmura money to help operate a network of youth clubs in poor neighborhoods. In another example, Tmura has also helped an Israeli humanitarian aid organization called Latet (Hebrew for “to give”). Latet aims to mobilize Israeli society to greater involvement in the humanitarian field, through heightened social awareness and the fostering of values such as mutual responsibility and giving.

I love the basic concept behind Tmura – everyone wins in an exit event. Especially the kids.

Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Facebook

Uncategorized , , ,

No one knows what to do with new technology

December 22nd, 2009

Jason Pontin, editor-in-chief and publisher of (MIT’s) Technology Review, has written an important essay titled “On the Evolution of Technology.”

The second sentence in the essay articulates the very reason I founded Rainier back in 1993: “When a technology first appears in the world, it is not understood: no one knows what to do with it.”

Pontin discusses Brian Arthur‘s book The Nature of Technology: What It Is and How It Evolves, and Arthur’s explanation of why truly new technologies are so slow to be adopted. New technology domains, he says, betray “missing pieces” that technologists must develop before useful applications can be successfully commercialized. One of these missing pieces, I believe, is the ability to clearly communicate new technologies to the market.

Pontin says the real economic value of new technologies is almost always imperfectly understood because the technologies’ markets do not yet exist. It’s been interesting for me to note over the years how true this is for so many of the technologies we are involved with bringing to market – especially those which are truly disruptive, or don’t quite fit into existing market categories.

Brian Arthur’s question, “What [does the new technology]allow people to do that could not be done before?” is one we ask our clients all the time.

The answer(s) are so crucial to successfully marketing a product, that we won’t even agree to launch a new technology until we’re satisfied the disruption, and all its necessary ecosystem components of success (what Arthur calls the “missing pieces” technologists must develop before useful applications can be successfully commercialized), has been thoroughly and defensibly defined.

Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Facebook

Uncategorized , , ,